|
In Memory of Sheeba Tucker October 15, 1998 - March 6, 2004 and Bacon, AKA "Mr. Puppy Love" March 6, 1999 to May 28, 2005 A Prayer for A Friend They say you are just a dog but not to me, a friend for life you will always be. You're a part
of my life that lit the way when sorrow filled my everyday. Through your eyes you could always see when people and life were getting to me. You'd wag your tail, crack a smile
and make us laugh for a little while Your life my friend has made a difference to three, to a boy named Matt and to Randy and me. I hope in your heart
you know you are loved and God will take you to heaven above My prayer my friend is that when my time ends you will be amongst my friends and that you will greet me on the other side,
never again to say goodbye. Chrissy Tucker One of the hardest things I've ever had to do was rest my hand on the head of my friend, talk to her and tell her goodbye,
while she was being put to sleep. Love comes in many forms and I found on that day that letting go of something you
love for its own good is one of the highest forms of love a person can give. Some people say animals are treated better then people. My four legged friend treated us better then most people
who have come in and out of our lives. Gone but never forgotton MEN WHO EMOTIONALLY ABANDON THEIR DAUGHTERS........DSM THIS IS ESPECIALLY FOR YOU Absent fathers are defined as those who do not interact with their children on a regular basis and consequently do not
play a significant role in their development. Divorce, death and abandonment are all forms of absence but nevertheless affect
female development differently. The age at which a daughter loses her father is meaningful since it influences her perception
of males, the world as well as her academic advancement. Fathers play a significant role in female achievement in mathematics
(Adams, Milner and Schrepf 1984, p. 128). Mathematics is typically associated with masculinity therefore females without father
figures may have less interest in this subject matter. Female high school seniors were more likely than their male peers to
say they did not take mathematics and science courses because they disliked the subject matter (35% and 22%) and had been
advised against taking these courses (32% and 26% respectively) (Bae, 1997). Essentially females are discouraged from pursuing
a career in mathematics and father absence contributes to this phenomenon by not providing them with a male role model to
stimulate their interest in this area. Security regarding females and their fathers is a key element since it greatly shapes their development (Griffin, 1998).
Women without father figures lack a sense of protection and as a result may become discouraged. Examples of this phenomenon
are teenage pregnancy, dropping out of college, never attempting college and low self esteem (Griffin, 1998, p. 21). Although
fatherless females may encounter limitations as a result of their missing fathers, it is not impossible for them to succeed. Stability is another important aspect affecting the lives of females, which inevitably shape their college careers. Fathers'
absence not only hinders their ability to make sound decisions, it also triggers negative reactions as opposed to positive
ones (Griffin, 1998, p.26). Daughters obtain secure foundations knowing what their fathers believe in and stand for (Griffin,
1998, p. 27). A confident base enables females to be successful in their endeavors and accomplish what they attempt. The purpose of this paper is to examine the behaviors and decisions made by females without father figures, while focusing
on their college attendance. This study also displays the categories in which most fatherless daughters are placed in terms
of success. Degrees of Absenteeism of Fathers Female observation and perception is dependent upon whether they lost their father to divorce, abandonment or death, and
at what age. How and why a father is absent will have an impact on the emotional and material outcome for the child (Grimm-Wassil,
1994, p. 5). The different answers help explain why some females have abandonment issues, depict men a certain way, have difficulties
determining their self worth or consequently become sexually promiscuous. Girls who have little contact with their fathers, especially during adolescence had great difficulties forming lasting
relationships with men. Sadly these females either shy away from males altogether or become sexually aggressive. Girls with
involved fathers learn how to interact with males by using the father-daughter relationship as a model. They not only have
a concerned male to converse with but also a feeling of acceptance, knowing they are loved by at least one male. Females without
father figures often become desperate for male attention (Grimm-Wassil, 1994). Females who lose their fathers to divorce or abandonment seek much more attention from men and had more physical contact
with boys their age than girls from intact homes. They also tend to be more critical of their fathers and the opposite sex.
These females constantly seek refuge for their missing father and as a result there is a constant need to be accepted by men
from whom they aggressively seek attention (Grimm-Wassil, 1994, p. 147).
HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT By: Christina Tassone I am so happy that she decided to run for President. Don't think for one minute that she didn't help make decisions
in the White House when Bill was President! I know that Hillary will bring this country up off it's knee's and bring
us back into better times. She does have her work cut out for her though, especially after the mess the Bush Administration
has made. She'll probably have to clean up their mess first before she can move forward. Yes, America does need change and Hillary is the person to make that change for us. OBAMA: I can not even consider voting for a man who can not salute my flag because he is a Muslim. That is
not acceptable on any level. If you're going to run for President of the United States then you better be prepared to
salute her flag. To me, that was not only disrespectful to our country but to the men and woman who serve it so
courageously and honorably. I read in article about the Nevada voters and to my dismay and surprise there are actually people out their who can not
think for themselves. One voter actually said she was voting for Obama because her "Union" said he was the best candidate.
I almost fell off of my chair. The first thing that came to my mind was the Scarecrow on The Wizard of Oz, "If I only
had a brain". How sad the American Voter is voting for someone, not on what they know to be his/her credentials,
but because "someone said so".
LUPUS
THE SILENT KILLER You can’t see it but it’s there, lurking
in every corner of your body waiting to strike. And it will strike and
when it does it will be when you least expect it. One day you’re fine and life is good and the next day you’re
lying in ICU fighting for your very life and the doctors don’t know why. For me, the first onset of Lupus was at the age
of 14 and it hasn’t stopped in 30 years. Pulmonary Emboli, miscarriages,
massive heart attack, inflamed organs, pericarditis, and the list goes on and on. It
always seemed to happen at the busiest times of my life; so I thought. Really
it was at the most stressful times of my life. Here are some Lupus facts. I want to remind everyone that a positive or negative ANA test does not determine if you have or don’t
have Lupus. Generally, ANA tests determine if the Kidneys are involved with the
flare-up. You need to see a Rheumatologist that specializes in Lupus to be diagnosed. It is not your Family Doctors place to make that diagnosis. They might be good, but I assure you, “they ain’t that good”. I CAN NOT STRESS THAT POINT ENOUGH. I went untreated for 5
years because my doctor thought he was Dr. God and refused to send me to Dr. Perhala, and yes Lupus took its toll during that
time and did irreparable damage. I encourage everyone who has Lupus or lives with someone who has Lupus to go to www.Lupus.org and to http://www.rwood.com/Articles/Lupus_Diet.htm Rebecca Wood is excellent
reading, you would be surprised how different kind of foods are enemies to those of us with Lupus (promote inflammation etc.). (Excerpts from www.lupus.org) Seventy percent of people with lupus
have systemic lupus. About half have organ-threatening disease: ·
heart ·
lung ·
kidney ·
liver ·
serious blood involvement and half have non-organ threatening
disease: ·
rash ·
fatigue ·
fever ·
aching, and/or pain
on taking a deep breath ·
normal urinalysis,
EKG, and chest x-ray. Undifferentiated Connective Tissue
Disease (UCTD) Finally, many people with early lupus-like
symptoms don't meet the ACR criteria but have an undifferentiated connective tissue disease process. Studies have shown that,
while many of these people will develop SLE over time, others will develop rheumatoid arthritis, have mild persistent symptoms,
or find that the process just disappears. How Can You Help Yourself? Physical Measures Be Careful In The Sun Two-thirds of the people with lupus
have problems with ultraviolet A and B (UVA and UVB) radiation from the sun. ·
If you are going to
be outside for more than five minutes, use a sunscreen. ·
Choose a sunscreen
that has a sun protection factor (SPF) of at least 15 ·
Make sure it blocks
both UVA and UVB rays. ·
UVB sun exposure is
greatest at midday, so do your outdoor activities earlier in the morning, late in the afternoon, or in the evening and wear
protective clothing. ·
Ultraviolet radiation
is also greater at higher altitudes. The UV exposure at sea level in one hour is the same as the exposure in five minutes
at an altitude of one mile like in Denver, Mexico City, or on a ski slope. Diet People with lupus should eat a nutritious,
well-balanced diet. ·
There are some suggestions
that fish, or specifically eicosopentanioc acid in fish oil, might have modest anti-inflammatory properties. The results of
double-blind controlled studies showed that eating the equivalent of two fish meals a week clearly helps rheumatoid arthritis
pain. ·
An amino acid, L-canavanine,
is found in alfalfa sprouts and can activate the immune system and increase inflammation in lupus patients. Other foods in
the legume family have only a fraction of the L-canavanine that sprouts do and are safe to eat. ·
Lupus patients taking
corticosteroids should limit their sugar and salt intake EEN - BEE LTD
Paul McCartney and his Gold Diggin Wife On his latest CD he sings a song called "Riding to Vanity Fair". The first time that I heard it I thought he was talking
about Heather; recently that was confirmed. How very sad for Paul, I just want to reach out, take his hand and tell
him it's going to alright. Then I want to reach out and smack Heather across the face for being a floozy-tramp. Gold digger ring a bell? I went searching the Internet to find out if other people around the world felt the same as I.
Low and behold, they do. Here are some comments from different people around the world. The first comment for me is
a "TOUCHETTE", exactly what I was thinking. I also want to say this, "I have loved Paul since the earliest days of my life; 2 years old my mother told me. The
Beatles were and are a huge part of my life. Growing up I only listened to the Beatles and Wings; honestly, I didn't even
know who the Eagles were or other famous bands of that era, because I did nothing but listen to Macca and the Beatles, with
guitar in hand. You couldn't see the wall in my room as it was covered with Macca, Mrs. Macca (LINDA), Wings and the
Beatles. The differance between Mrs. Macca and Heather? Look in Paul's eyes; it says everything. Listen to the music he wrote for
each; My Love versus Riding to Vanity Fair. Heather Mills could live 10 life times and Mrs. Macca (LINDA) would
still have more class in her little finger then that Gold Digger could ever have. Beatrice should be provided for. Heather should get nothing. She knew what she was after when she married
Paul. This latest story from her ex husband confirms it! How come he had such a wonderful long marriage with Linda if there
was any problem with him? Here are several excerpts from an inteview with her ex-husband as he speaks out; for free. Mind
you, she has a history of going from one to the other---usually the other has more money. She must have thought she hit the
Jackpot when she snared Sir Paul. Alfie Kamal told the Evening Standard he was not surprised the marriage had collapsed in acrimony. He had issued a
"Buyer Beware" warning when the former Beatle began dating Ms Mills and his prediction of disaster had finally come true.
We have both been Heathered," he said. "If there is anything I have in common with Sir Paul it's probably that. "I don't know the details of why their marriage has broken down but from what I can make out they cannot bear to be
in the same room together. That's how it goes with her. You get to a point where you start to hate her and hate the way she
is." Here are comments from other readers from The Standard. It appears that the criticisms of Heather's being selfish, self centred and money oriented are closer
to the truth than most thought. This awful woman should be made to hand over a large wodge to poor Sir Paul. The article just backs up what most people already thought. I watched a programme about Heather Mills on the biography channel; it was eye opening and she is not the "nice" person
she likes to be portrayed. She definitely deserves to leave with nothing. She didn't help him make his money and she had nothing to do with his
success. He deserves a lot better than her and her selfish attitude. Sir Paul worked hard for his money and he is the one who earned it, not Heather! Even though she was married to him,
it was a very short-lived marriage and I fail to see how she can expect to gain such huge amounts of money for such a short-lived
marriage.
Love
can touch us one time and last for a lifetime Mark,
you are that one true time. You spend your days and nights
wondering, "what if" it would have been different? What if you didn’t leave and things would have worked out? So finally
you find the information you need and you find him, and all you can do is cross your fingers that he hadn’t married;
or forgot about you. She sends her letter to the man who captivated her heart,
the man whose eyes she could spend hours looking into. All he had to do was say
her name and her heart would beat so fast and so hard that she thought it would just race right out of her chest. Everyday she waits for a letter
or a phone call, everyday she runs to the mailbox and nothing, and every time the phone rings she giggles hoping its Mark
on the other end. Then the letter that she sent is returned to her. She calls his Mother and she says, “Chrissy, Mark is dead”. And you just want to scream
because you don't want to believe it, and the sadness darkens your heart and you realize that once again you've lost each
other, but this time it's for good. There's no turning back, there's no making up for lost time, there's not even a
chance to say goodbye. He's just gone. The eyes you wanted so desperately to gaze into again, the mouth you wanted to
brush against your lips just one more time. Just one more time is gone and all that is left is a memory and tears
that come with no warning, a sinking sadness in your heart, a life and person that can not be replaced. and you keep repeating the words “always to late”. She
stares at the returned letter in her desk drawer. She won’t throw it away,
she won’t open it, he was alive and well when she wrote it. It isn’t fair, but then again life isn’t fair
I guess. Somewhere deep in the sadness,
she knows that someday she’ll see him again, because she knows that somewhere in time they were meant to be together
if not in this life then in the next. I love you Mark, I loved your
soul from the first time we ever we looked into each others eyes. Love you forever, Chrissy Our mission is to help the people of Canada © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2001 I am deeply grateful for the exceptional ideas, guidance and support of the members of the Parent Abuse Project
Advisory Committee, a sub-Committee of the Committee Against Woman Abuse. Diane Kays, a therapist with the Family Service
Association of the Halifax Regional Municipality, first identified parent abuse as an issue we should explore. Diane and Glenda
Hayden, a therapist with the Avalon Sexual Assault Centre, provided much of the background discussion and ideas for the sections
on counselling and therapy. Darlene MacLean, the Assistant Program Coordinator and Bookkeeper at the Bayers Westwood Family
Resource Centre, offered her personal and professional reflections into the problem; Anne Goodwill's sharp eyes kept us from
making mistakes, and Linda Roberts, the Multi-Service Coordinator at the Captain William Spry Community Centre, contributed
her organizational wisdom and expertise. I would also like to thank the many concerned parents, professionals and youth who generously contributed
time and expertise to this project. Parent Abuse:The Abuse of Parents by Their Teenage Children is based on what they
told us. Thanks also to Mary Anne Finlayson, Christy Nickerson and Margo Wheaton for their invaluable input into the research
and writing, to Jeanette Tobin, Nova Scotia Drug Dependency, for her expertise on substance abuse, and to Tod Augusta-Scott,
the Program Coordinator of Bridges - A Domestic Abuse Intervention Program, for his insight into the issue of responsibility
and abuse. I also drew on the work of the following people and would like to thank them for sharing their
ideas and for their encouragement of this work: Anne-Marie Ambert, a professor at York University, whose books on parenting include The Effect
of Children on Parents and Parents, Children, and Adolescents: Interactive Relationships and Development in Context. Jackie Barkley, a clinical therapist with Choices Adolescent Treatment Program, Central Regional
Health Board, author of "Reclaiming Our Children: Teachers as Elders" in Daily Meaning: Counternarratives of Teachers'
Work and "The Politics of Parenting and the Youth Crisis" in Power and Resistance: Critical Thinking About Canadian
Social Issues. Peter Monk, a child and family therapist who conducted research on the topic in British Columbia.
His study is titled Adolescent-to-Parent Violence: A Qualitative Analysis of Emerging Themes (Unpublished thesis.) Jerome Price, who works with teens and their families at the Michigan Family Institute and is author
of Power and Compassion: Working with Difficult Adolescents and Abused Parents. The project was funded by the Family Violence Prevention Unit of Health Canada and my thanks go
to Liette Lalonde for her support of this work. Twenty years ago, people thought spousal abuse was a rare occurrence. Victims were blamed with
statements such as "she must like it or why would she stay?" and "she probably provoked him." Abuse was seen as a private
family matter and there were few supports available. Since the issue of violence within families has come to public attention,
policies and supports have been put in place and attempts are being made to protect adults from abusive spouses and children
from abusive parents. Another form of family violence that may occur as often but is still a well-kept secret is the
abuse of parents by their adolescent children. There are striking similarities between current attitudes toward parent abuse and the old attitudes
toward wife abuse. Parents are usually the first people blamed for the behaviour of their children, but there are few supports
and interventions available to them. There is also little public awareness of parent abuse. To determine the nature and parameters of parent abuse, initial research was conducted in 1995-96
in Halifax, Nova Scotia by Barbara Cottrell and Mary Anne Finlayson of Meta Research and Communications. The project was sponsored
by the Captain William Spry Community Centre, the Committee Against Woman Abuse and the Family Service Association of the
Halifax Regional Municipality, and was funded by Health Canada. We talked to parents, professionals and adolescents in group discussions and in formal and informal
individual interviews. We listened to 45 parents who had experienced parent abuse; 39 teenagers; 34 community workers, clinicians,
academics and other professionals. A number of people interviewed self-identified as both a professional and a parent of an
abusive teen. Some of the questions we attempted to answer were: What is parent abuse? How widespread is parent abuse? Who is the abuser? Who is being abused? How is the family affected? Why is the abuse happening? Where can families get help? We also researched the literature and found a huge void on the topic of the abuse of parents by
their teenage children. A 1993 literature review prepared for the Family Violence Prevention Unit of Health Canada (Four
Variations of Family Violence: A Review of Sociological Research, 1993: 8) states that the substantial body of data on
family violence includes little reliable information on forms of violence other than spousal abuse. It warns that "(M)any
young people.. physically victimize their parents. Again, this is a problem that has been, by and large, ignored by Canadian
researchers." Little has been published on the topic since then, yet counsellors, social workers and other professionals continue
to hear from clients more and more anecdotal evidence of this form of family violence. A pamphlet, guide and final report documented the research findings. Follow-up research At the request of Health Canada, 25 interviews were conducted in 1999 to determine
how useful the 1996 materials were. Fifteen people who had requested the materials talked about how they accessed and used
the materials, and 10 parents of abusive adolescents discussed their experiences and how these related to the information
in the materials. Both parents and professionals were extremely positive about the materials. They found the work "an eye-opener"
and said it accurately described their experiences. Most people we spoke to said they had not seen the issue discussed anywhere other than in Parent
Abuse, and they were glad to see the topic "out in the open." Parents said that it helped them identify their experiences
as abuse. They also said it helped them take action. It helps you look at (the teen's) behaviour in a different way and to realize that it's
not right for our children to act like this and it's not something we should put up with. This publication is an updated version of the 1996 publication. Children are not adults. They are dependent, vulnerable persons, requiring protection
and leadership. The relationship between parents and children is not equal: it is a protective, unequal relationship of an
adult with a dependent child. The relative balance between dependence and independence is not static and changes with the
age of the child, but essentially equality is not achieved until adulthood. In a positive parent-child relationship, the parent
has accountability and responsibility to provide reasonable authority over the child. The relationship is dysfunctional when
the reverse is true, and carries with it the potential for abuse. Occasional conflict between people who live together, including parents and their children, is
normal. Parent abuse is difficult to define because it is not always clear when certain behaviours are "normal" and when they
are "abusive." Conflict becomes abusive when one person uses threats, force or manipulation to gain power over the other.
Parent abuse is any act of a child that is intended to cause physical, psychological or financial damage to gain power and
control over a parent. Teenagers normally go through a process of trying to establish their sense of separateness from
their parents. This is called "individuating," and may at times include some defiance or resistance toward authority. There
is a difference, however, between resistance and aggression, between separating from a parent and trying to take control of
a parent, between "normal" teenage behaviour and "parent abuse." Abusive adolescent behaviour ranges from mild to severe violence. Parents have to examine their
teen's behaviour and determine whether it is acceptable or if it has become abusive. Abusive behaviour should not be tolerated. The abuse usually begins with verbal abuse. For most parents, the abuse is a daily occurrence
that follows a pattern, usually with the child showing no signs of remorse or guilt. 3 There
was no remorse, he felt totally justified in his behaviour. Some parents, however, reported a cycle of abuse similar to spousal abuse, where the child expresses
remorse, and sometimes self-hatred. Even when abusive teens do not express remorse, many parents sense that the teens are
aware that their behaviour is hurtful. Some parents report that teens who abuse drugs or alcohol exhibit a frightening lack
of emotion concerning their abuse. Any behaviour that is deliberately harmful to the parent and used as a form of control may be defined
as abuse. The abuse may be physical, psychological (including verbal) or financial. Most abuse can be classified in more than
one way. Here are some examples of the various forms of abuse: Physical abuse hitting, punching, slapping or kicking shoving and pushing breaking things punching holes in the walls throwing things spitting Parents' accounts of the physical abuse they experience at the hands of their teens are graphic
and frightening: He pushed me against the door and I slid down. He punched me two times in the leg and
left. Teens can display aggression that leaves the parent with the unmistakable message: "If I can do
this to a wall, I can do it to you. I'm in control here." Psychological abuse and emotional terrorism intimidating the parent, making the parent fearful maliciously playing mind games, trying to make the parent think he or she is crazy making unrealistic demands on parents, such as insisting they drop what they're doing to comply
with the child's demands purposely not telling the parent where they're going or what they're doing running away from home or staying out all night lying threatening to hurt, maim or kill the parent or someone else making manipulative threats, such as threatening to run away, commit suicide or otherwise hurt
themselves without really intending to do so degrading the parent or other family members withholding affection controlling the running of the household I thought he would punch me in the face. He was really wild and it frightened me.
(A parent) Verbal abuse is one form of psychological abuse. This includes: yelling arguing, challenging ( "I don't have to do anything you say!") being sarcastic or critical, belittling laughing in the parent's face name calling ( "You bitch!") "I hate you!" swearing at the parent Some adolescent behaviour is more irresponsible and thoughtless than abusive. However, in some
cases, adolescents deliberately use psychological means to manipulate, control and hurt their parents. This teen was fully
aware of the impact of his behaviour: 5 I used to play mind games with my parents, but I never hit them. I'd do little things
to upset them, to get them going. Like I'd take the batteries out of the TV and VCR remote control and hide them, then watch
my father go nuts trying to change the channel. Or, I'd lock up a little box in my room and put it under the bed, but leave
a corner sticking out, like I'd meant to hide it. There'd be nothing in it, but it would drive my parents crazy thinking I
had dope or something in my room. Financial abuse stealing money or parent's belongings (sometimes referred to as "borrowing" without permission)
selling possessions, their own or the parents' destroying the home or parents' belongings demanding parents buy things they don't feel they can afford incurring debts the parents must cover (e.g. as a result of damage to or theft of others' property)
Parents face tremendous ongoing pressure from the culturally pervasive idea that they should provide
their children with material possessions. While most teens try to persuade their parents to provide them with the latest in
brand-name goods, some abusive teens capitalize on their parents' feelings of obligation and inadequacy by attempting to force
them to spend far more than they can afford: You can't reason with her. If she wants something that I can't afford, I explain it to
her and she says "I don't want to hear this." She thinks everything's my fault. I even took out a bank loan because she wanted
a whole new bedroom suite, but it's never enough, she always wants more. Many professionals believe that parent abuse is increasing in our society. Few statistics are available
to support or contradict this belief. Police records do not specify the relationship between the victim and perpetrator in
charges of assault, and the Young Offenders' Act prevents access to information on charges against minors. Hospitals,
shelters and other institutions such as child welfare and adolescent mental health agencies and schools, where we would expect
to hear reports of parent abuse, often do not recognize, record or report the problem. Although many professionals believe that boys tend to be more physically violent toward their parents
than girls, our research indicates that both boys and girls participate in all forms of abuse. Professionals believe that the foundation of abusive behaviour begins long before the children
are teenagers. Most of the parents we interviewed said the abuse began when the child was between 12 and 14. Some parents
were aware that their children exhibited signs of violent behaviour at an earlier age (four or five years) but initially viewed
the behaviour as a "tantrum" rather than abuse. Teenagers' greater physical size may make them more threatening, and parents
then begin to identify the child's behaviour as abusive. Many abusive teens participate in socially deviant activities such as drug or alcohol use or criminal
activities (shoplifting, fraud, break and enter, theft, violent crime and/or prostitution). When teens become involved in
drugs or alcohol, parents sometimes notice a sudden, drastic change in their school work, relationships and behaviour. Sometimes youth who are abusive toward their parents have themselves been the victims of physical,
sexual and/or emotional abuse. This may have occurred within their nuclear or extended family, or outside the family altogether.
Some teens are not the direct victims of violence but may have witnessed it in their homes. It is recognized that children
who witness violence are at a greater risk of developing behaviour problems, such as aggression with peers, non-compliance
with adults, destructive behaviour, and conflict with the law. Because families experience changes in structure and income, it is difficult to describe the typical
abused parent as single or married, wealthy or poor. The majority (76%) of the parents in the 1996 study had single-parented
during their lives. (The study was not based on a random sample, so this proportion may not represent the family composition
distribution in which teens abuse their parents.) Parent abuse occurs in families from various races, social classes and family
structures. Our study included adopted children, step-children, foster children and biological children, and while the majority
of those interviewed were single parents at the time of the interview, the problem also occurs in two-parent families. The average age of parents we interviewed in the 1996 study was 44 years. This contradicts the
popular belief that parent abuse is experienced primarily by people who became parents at too young an age. Mothers and step-mothers, in both single and two-parent homes, are the most common targets of teenagers'
abusive behaviour. Many mothers are intimidated by their son's and daughter's physical size and greater strength, although
mothers who are physically larger than their teen also experience abuse. Mothers seem less able than fathers to take a stand
and give their teenager an ultimatum to follow the rules or leave the house and often protect their children even when the
children are victimizing them. Fathers and step-fathers are also victims of parent abuse but generally not to the same extent
as mothers and step-mothers. When violence occurs between children and their fathers, fathers often react violently and perceive
the incident as a fight rather than abuse. Parents with disabilities, including fathers, are also frequent victims. Some teens also abuse other vulnerable members of the family such as younger siblings or family
pets. As with other forms of family violence, it seems that abusers victimize
the people they see as vulnerable. All abused parents experience a range of emotions, from fear of their teenager and fear for the
safety of their teenager, to guilt about pressing police charges for assault. Most parents have difficulty accepting that
their child could be abusive toward them and may initially deny the problem: He's my kid. You make excuses, you don't see it for what it is. Many parents feel depressed and filled with shame that they were not able to produce a happy family.
They question their parenting abilities, agonize over where they went wrong, and begin to feel like failures. Women particularly
live under the threat of not meeting societal expectations and being condemned as bad mothers. One mother said: I feel punished. It's like all the mistakes I made in parenting have come back to haunt
me. In this society we do not collectively take responsibility for our children. While parents certainly
play a major role in their child's development, they are usually blamed for everything that goes wrong. They, along with everyone
else, buy into this belief and often take full responsibility for their abusive child's actions. Ambert challenges this narrow perspective of the parent-child relationship: [The] public still sees parents as the prime, and often only, influence on their children.
Even if they perceive that peers can be very important, they still feel that, if their adolescents suffer from the effect
of the detrimental influence of their peer group, the negative consequences are still the parents' fault. Challenging the belief that parents are the sole influence on their children can be a refreshing
perspective for parents, especially those struggling with guilt and shame over the actions of their children. The idea that
parents are the sole influence on their children negates the effect of other social influences in the child's life and places
an impossible load of responsibility on the parents' shoulders. When they seek help they frequently encounter messages of
blame. This feeling of being blamed and the sense of being solely responsible sometimes makes it difficult for parents to
hear positive and useful suggestions to change their behaviour as a possible solution to difficulties with their children: It is so hard to ask for help because you don't want to define yourself as a failure.
You don't want to admit you didn't succeed with this child. In addition to feeling solely responsible, parents often feel unsupported and isolated. They feel
hopeless and helpless because they are unable to control the situation, either because of physical danger or their own emotional
turmoil. Despair at not having a harmonious family life and feeling isolated in the situation makes change all the more difficult.
The psychological abuse parents experience is as unnerving and soul destroying as physical abuse. As Jerome Price, in his
book Power and Compassion: Working with Difficult Adolescents and Abused Parents, says: The greatest roadblock to change is the hopelessness that abused parents feel and the
inertia that results from their despair. Parents of aggressive adolescents appear to be either paralyzed into an emotionless
stupor or activated to perform a set of ritualized reactions in which they helplessly rage against the tyranny of their children. Teens' abusive behaviour often leads to arguments between adults in the home as to how the teen
should be disciplined. This limits the amount of quality time the adults are able to spend together. Many couples' relationships
undergo a tremendous amount of strain and are sometimes torn apart because of the teen's behaviour: It drove a wedge between my wife and me. I had to decide between being a father to my
children or a husband to my wife. It was impossible to see my child as the culprit - she was always quiet and docile when
I came home, and it was my wife who was "freaking out." Almost all abused parents feel unable to trust their teen, especially when they are left unsupervised
at home. The uncertainty of what will confront them when they return is always on the parents' mind. Some wonder whether the
child will be home at all, or if their home and possessions will be damaged, while others just dread having to deal with their
teen: It was so bad I'd be glad to go to work and I'd dread coming home. My first fear was she
wouldn't be home, my second was that she would be home. I'd go home on the bus worrying about what she'd do to hurt me tonight. The stress of dealing with an abusive teen can have a negative impact on parents' health, sometimes
making existing health problems worse, sometimes causing new problems. A number of parents told us that they use prescribed
medication to help them deal with the tension and stress of the situation. Some parents also turn to alcohol or drugs to help
them cope. When the teenager has had to leave the house, some family members experience a strong sense of
loss: siblings no longer have their brother or sister, and parents grieve for the loss of their child. They are also grieving
for the loss of the family as a unit. This experience is especially traumatic in single-parent families where the teen is
an only child. In cases where the teenager has a child, parents lose not only their child, but also their contact with the
grandchild. Adolescents' abusive behaviour affects other children in the home and parents fear for their safety.
Some parents are concerned that observing a sibling's dangerous activities (drugs, alcohol, prostitution) may affect the other
children and put the rest of the family at risk. In addition, focussing on the abusive teen often leaves little time and energy
for parents to pay attention to the other children. Parents reported that the children who are being ignored sometimes act
out in order to get attention, or become depressed. The parents' and child's relationships with friends and extended family members can be jeopardized
by the abuse. Teens also manipulate other family members into believing the abuse is the parents' fault: She'd tell her father I'd done things to her, call my sister and mother and tell them
all things I hadn't even done. She slowly eroded my relationship with my mother. The stress of dealing with the abuse spreads beyond the home. Parents take their concerns and anxiety
with them to the workplace. The worry experienced by parents whose teenagers are skipping school, or who have run away from
home, can make it difficult for them to concentrate at work. Their concern about the child's whereabouts, whether the child
is in trouble or in danger, can lead to anxiety about their jobs and even about the security of their job. Some parents also worry about the number of phone calls they receive at work concerning their teenager,
as well as the amount of time they have to take off to deal with emergency situations or court appearances. The cost of counselling
the family when public services are inadequate or unavailable can cause an added financial strain that makes it even more
imperative that parents keep their jobs. There is no definitive explanation for parent abuse; there are, in fact, a multitude of interconnected
dynamics contributing to the behaviour. However, several contributing factors have been identified. There is a need for clear structure and leadership in families. Parents need to know how to be
in charge, to realize they have the right to set limits, and to say, "This is my house and you can't behave that way in it."
They are sometimes afraid of losing the love of their teen by enforcing rules and standards of behaviour. Sometimes parents
are so intimidated they try to avoid confrontation by allowing the adolescent to rule the household. When teens feel their parents are not in control, they act out because they don't feel safe. The
developmental tasks of adolescents are typically complex and can be difficult. For most teenagers, it is an added burden to
cope with power over their parents. It is normal for adolescents to go through a period of "I hate your rules," but the parents' job
is to rein the children in tighter and impose the rules. Sometimes parents' attempts to enforce house rules are successful.
However, some children become even more abusive and refuse to obey the rules when their parents make it clear that the teen's
behaviour is not acceptable, and they impose appropriate consequences. Now my daughter decides she's not going to follow the rules around curfews or helping
with housework. I don't think those rules were unreasonable. In situations in which parents have separated, the children sometimes resent the parent they live
with (usually the mother) for changing their home, community, school, friends or lifestyle. Teenagers are sometimes jealous
of the loss of attention from their mother or father when new partners become involved. When the mother is a single parent,
teens sometimes vent all their anger and frustration on her simply because she is present. One teen, when asked why she abuses
her mother, said "Because I have no one else." Feelings of isolation and alienation from families, schools and society can be experienced by teenagers
in North American culture. Feelings of disconnection do not lead most adolescents to act abusively, and are not the sole basis
of violent teenage behaviour, but there may be a link between this isolation and teenage aggression. Modern-day pressures of work and finances create additional stress and problems for the family
and leave parents with little time to spend with their teens. When children are younger, parents take the responsibility of
planning their activities, but when they begin to reach adolescence this becomes increasingly more difficult. Teens who feel alienated from their parents often crave for their attention and will often act
out abusively as a means of expressing their frustration and anger. Further, adolescents may lack the maturity to exercise
self-control, and this can lead to other forms of socially deviant behaviour. These teens need adult guidance and leadership. In our society, violence and aggression are commonly used to achieve goals and maintain control.
Parents shout at their children, the police pepper spray protesters, and Hollywood's good guys shoot and kill to save the
world. Aggression and violent images invade most corners of our lives. In some families or communities, physical, emotional
or verbal abuse is an accepted method of communication. If it has been occurring for years or generations, it may have become
customary behaviour. Some abusive teens have themselves been the victims of physical, sexual or emotional abuse, or
have witnessed their parents or siblings being abused and may become abusive as a way to regain some of their lost power and
control. According to Shuman and Seiffge-Krenke: Many studies have provided evidence to support the hypothesis that adolescent violent
behaviour is a function of having experienced or witnessed child abuse. Wisdom (1989) reviewed the findings of such studies
and determined that boys exhibiting violent behaviors were more likely to have experienced abuse or witnessed extreme physical
abuse than non-violent boys. Unfortunately, the teens who respond with abuse often do not focus their retaliation on the perpetrator
- instead they abuse their non-abusive parent. Shuman and Seiffge-Krenke also state that boys, more than girls, tend to identify with their fathers
and are likely to possess their fathers' negative and positive traits. This has serious implications for boys who have witnessed
their fathers' abusive behaviour toward their mothers. In this 1984 study,1 it was found that 23% of the fathers of violent youths had battered their wives. The authors conclude that "a combination
of paternal aggression, inadequate discipline and negative attitude toward the child fosters aggressive and delinquent behaviour"
(1997: 181). The continued devaluation of women means that women still earn less money than men and are under-represented
in positions of power. As the victims of ongoing violence and denigration, many women lack confidence in themselves as human
beings and as parents. Yet, women are still primarily responsible for parenting our children. Although many fathers are equally
concerned about their abusive children and share responsibility in seeking help for the problem, some are emotionally or physically
absent, or abusive. In the past few decades, an increase in aggressive behaviour among teenage girls has been observed.
Some people have suggested that young women today are rebelling against the traditional concept that "girls are timid, passive
and fearful." Many young women want to be powerful and recognized and their anger can sometimes be understood as justified
and constructive, a response to social injustice and dominance. However, their anger is sometimes unjustified and inappropriately
expressed. Some professionals report that girls express hatred toward their mothers for being submissive,
and for subjecting themselves and their children to the violence of their husband or partner. These girls are wary of the
passivity and abusively, often imitating the aggressive behaviour of males. One mother reports that her teenage daughter contemptuously
yelled at her, "You're nothing but a coward!" Strategies such as submission, which women use to cope with abuse, often lead
to further victimization. Traditionally, women have been aware of and been receptive to the feelings and emotions of those
around them. In our interviews, many teens agreed that it was easier to share their emotions with their mothers. They're not
as afraid of their mothers as they are of their fathers, who have been socialized to respond to teens' feelings more aggressively.
Teens said things like, "I'd never dare hit my Dad." As a result, adolescents can express a whole range of feelings toward
their mothers, including anger. You can get over a fight with your mom quicker than with anyone else. If you fight with
a friend, you don't talk for a long time. Teens take their parents for granted. They take out their aggression on their parents
because parents will forgive them. Youth are under a great deal of pressure from schools and from their peers. The school environment
can be violent, unsafe and disrespectful. Teens experience violence and the threat of violence at the hands of other students.
The threat of violence and the pressure to be "cool" at school makes many teens feel vulnerable and lowers their self-esteem.
They feel they have to be in control to avoid being victimized and learn not to show weakness in front of their peers. Teachers
often feel as powerless as any other adult to deal with teens' aggression. School is really violent and abusive. You should hear the way the kids talk, they say,
"Don't mess with me" and they mean it. My friend was walking along one day and some guy comes up to him and says, "Where's
that $20 you owe me?" If you're halfways nervous, if you're not a cool person, you'd have to get the money for him even if
you never borrowed it, otherwise you live in fear of being beaten up. There are few outlets for adolescents to deal with the stress they experience at school, and many
teens act out their victimization and rage in severely violent ways at home. Parents who are being abused reported rarely
feeling supported or helped by the schools their children attend. While every situation must be assessed on its own merits,
as this parent says, communication with the school is essential. Parents need to stay connected to the school. The school needs to know that there is a
family for these kids, the school will be less likely to see the parents as the cause, and it will keep them from simply expelling
the kids, and will help the situation. Alcohol and drug abuse is commonly linked with teenagers' violent behaviour. According to a 1994
survey,2 use of illicit drugs is primarily a teenage phenomenon. The highest use of cannabis was reported by males age 15-24
(26%-28%). It was estimated that in the 15 to 17 age group, 27% of males use cannabis; 31% have used at least one illicit
drug in their lifetime; and 27% of males use at least one illicit drug. The statistics for young women are only slightly lower:
24% of females in the 15 to 17 age group use cannabis; 29% have used at least one illicit drug in their lifetime; and 24%
use at least one illicit drug. A series of surveys on Canadian youth aged 11, 13 and 153 has found that, since 1994, there has been a sharp increase in youth who by Grade 10 had used marijuana three or more
times. According to the report, in 1994 30% of boys and 27% of girls used marijuana. In 1998, this had risen to 44% of boys
and 41% of girls. There is also a slight increase in the adolescent use of solvents. In 1994, 7% of boys and 5% of girls were
users; in 1998: 9% of boys and 6% of girls. Cocaine use also rose slightly, from 3% to 6% for boys, and 3% to 5% for girls. The report concludes that, since the 1994 survey, there has been a strong relationship between
use of marijuana and other health-risk behaviour, and those who use marijuana are also more likely to use alcohol, smoke cigarettes,
and spend a great deal of time with other adolescents who engage in the same behaviour. They're more likely to feel pressured
at school, skip classes and bully others. Although substance abuse does not cause violent behaviour, parents report that when their teen
is using drugs, their behaviour is more severe and the teen shows no sense of remorse. Her anger was much worse when she was on drugs. There was a cutting edge to her. There
was no feeling. The drugs wiped out all her feelings. Price (1996) notes that drug abuse is often perceived as the cause of a child's problematic behaviour
and cautions that drug abuse, moodiness and dropping grades are often symptoms of other serious problems. Substance abuse
by parents can contribute to the problem of parent abuse. Teenagers may be angry with their parents for being unavailable
and emotionally abandoning them, and may attempt to control the parents by threatening to reveal their substance abuse. In some rare instances, adolescent violence is a symptom of a serious mental disorder, such as
schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. Unfortunately, these disorders are often difficult to diagnose. I dragged myself and him around to every specialist and expert trying to get help. I was
told I was over-controlling or under-controlling. Their main message was I should tighten the boundaries. I went to a number
of very good people in this city, but they all missed the point. After years of hell he was diagnosed as schizophrenic. Although such a serious diagnosis may explain some behaviour, Price cautions: The greatest roadblock to change is the hopelessness that abused parents feel and the
inertia that results from their despair. Parents of aggressive adolescents appear to be either paralyzed into an emotionless
stupor or activated to perform a set of ritualized reactions in which they helplessly rage against the tyranny of their children. Price also cautions that parents should not let labels or diagnoses frighten them into believing
they cannot expect to be treated respectfully by their children. However, until mentally ill children are properly diagnosed, parents struggle to understand their
behaviour. I thought he was being manipulative, but now I realize he was in a state of psychosis.
I was full of anger and blamed him, but he had to get practically sick unto death before he could get help from professionals.
These young men are not stupid or evil. They are very alone and are very difficult people to deal with. Not all mental health professionals address the child's abusive behaviour toward the parents. We worked with one psychiatrist who did not in any way address the abuse issues.We repeatedly
brought up the issue of violence because it was escalating. As the violence continued to worsen, I was told to call the police
and the situation was never looked at comprehensively and in depth. Not only do they not get it, but they make it worse. We
started working with another psychiatrist, but she didn't address the abuse issues either. At that point my daughter was locking
me in closets, putting her fists through walls and raging on a daily basis. And that went on for a year and a half. Medical diagnoses give parents relief from guilt and blame, and the prescribed medications often
help control aggressive behaviours. While a diagnosis brings some relief, it can also harness the parent to caring for a mentally
ill child for life. After an adolescent is diagnosed, parents need support. Parents also need to know what they are dealing with. They need to know that if their
child has a severe mental illness like schizophrenia, they are isolated and withdrawn and suffer from terrible loneliness. Some teens who exhibit violent or aggressive behaviour toward their parents or others are diagnosed
as having: Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD or ADD) Oppositional Defiant Disorder Conduct Disorders, including Adolescent Adjustment Disorder. While these diagnoses identify a problem, some parents and professionals believe that doctors do
little more than label the symptoms and prescribe medication where they deem it appropriate. Parents and professionals are
concerned about widespread prescription drug use among teens, and with the impact of labelling a child. Some parents believe
that this labelling is used to excuse certain behaviours and this creates further problems: She possibly had a mental illness or emotional problem, but that's not the issue; it's
not an excuse. It was her behaviour we needed to look at. We are a generation who put our energy into making teens happy and comfortable instead of responsible.
We have attempted to change the role of the parent from authoritative disciplinarian to partners in a more equal relationship
in which parents are "friends" with their children. The result is that children develop images of parents as the people whose
job it is to make them happy. Sometimes, this results in inappropriate and unhealthy parent-child relationships in which parents
treat their children as companions or partners. This places an unfair burden on the teen. We wanted to be the kids' friends, but we now realize that we have to be their parents;
they have lots of friends out there. In the first half of the 19th century, children were considered the property of adults. They were
expected to "be seen and not heard," and were often treated disrespectfully, sometimes cruelly, by adults both at home and
in school. Children had few rights and parents were seldom held responsible for harming their children. The permissive 1960s
and the work to end child abuse changed much of that. While few dispute that children's rights must be recognized, attempts
to protect these rights have led to a severe crisis in leadership within families. The "new ethics in child rearing" that began in the 1960s shifted focus away from the need for
structure and leadership within the family in an attempt to recognize children's basic need to have their feelings and opinions
valued. Kindness, leniency and an emphasis on the importance of a child's free expression of feelings became the central themes
of positive parenting. The rule that has come to dominate today's theories of child rearing is that parents must
be lenient. Price lists familiar catch phrases and popular notions that discourage parents from taking control
of their children: Children must make their own mistakes. If parents take charge, young people will never learn responsibility themselves. It's their life. Children must be trusted (whether they've earned that trust or not); otherwise, the growth of the
inner self will be stunted and creativity and self-expression thwarted. Young people have to make their own decisions (therefore, parents shouldn't force their judgement
on young people.) A child's ego will be harmed if his or her right to total privacy is violated. It's intrusive to punish without giving advance warning as to the consequences. The "Parenting practices" section above is based on the work
of Jerome Price (1996: 18, 19). The parental role has become professionalized4 as parents are pressured to consult experts for advice and direction. Writers, psychologists, social workers and consultants
set themselves up as "experts" on child rearing. Freud and Dr. Spock were but two of the "experts" who became famous for telling
parents what they should and should not do. A huge and profitable publishing industry flourishes as books and magazines describe
the terrible, lifelong impact of poor parenting on our children. Some parents are coerced into buying these books out of a
fear of damaging their children forever. This results in parents losing their confidence in their ability to parent and in
taking the leadership role in their families. They then lack the confidence necessary to exert reasonable parental authority
and consequently some children lack the boundaries they need for their moral and spiritual growth. Popular culture also exposes children and youth to increasingly violent images. "Attitude" - that
is, a stance of being rude, hostile, detached and aggressive - is cool. Without the necessary boundaries, this attitude is
sometimes directed at parents. Most parents and professionals believe that children's basic rights must be recognized and respected.
However, most also believe that a balance must exist between young people's rights and their responsibilities; teenagers are
responsible for their own actions and behaviour and must be held accountable for their conduct. Although they may strongly
resist it, adolescents need leadership from their parents, and the adults in charge of the culture adolescents are living
in must be held accountable for the world we have created for them. There's no easy way to stop teenagers from abusing their parents, but there are some things parents
can do to help themselves: Parents can shift their thinking from looking for a quick fix to recognition that they are involved
in a - sometimes long - process. The solutions rarely come overnight. Stopping parent abuse is a process. Parents have to find out what works for them because the dynamics are different in every case.
How the abuse is stopped will depend on the individual situation of each family. To find out what might work in their case, parents have to try different things. Parents can shop around. Therapists and others in the helping professions have different beliefs
and different styles. Working on the issue, instead of being passive and helpless, gives the parent strength. When they
are trying to find a solution, they can feel better about themselves. When the abuse is over - it often diminishes and ends
eventually - parents can feel better knowing they have tried a number of ways to find a solution. To help families and stop parent abuse, we have to break the silence that surrounds it. Because
parent abuse is still not recognized, it is often considered acceptable behaviour. The first step to ending the abuse is recognizing
that it is abuse. I'm astounded at the number of parents, professionals and school teachers who are referring
youth to us because of substance abuse, and when I ask what other behaviour they're exhibiting at home and school they say,
"Oh, the usual adolescent behaviour, he or she curses and swears, stomps around, threatens, lots of name calling." It's abusive
behaviour and it gets called "usual adolescent behaviour." Even extremely abusive behaviour is now considered acceptable.
The women's movement made men's abuse toward women unacceptable, now we have to do the same with adolescent abuse. It may
be "normal" but it certainly isn't right or acceptable. Because of a dearth of information about parent abuse, it is not known how often it occurs. There
is also a severe lack of resources and supports. Many parents feel that the resources available seem to blame and defeat them
rather than offer support. They often suffer abuse in isolation because of the shame and lack of public awareness attached
to the issue. Hospitals, shelters and other institutions lack information about the topic and rarely ask the questions that
could break through the silence and lead parents to gain support. I was in the food court at a shopping mall recently, and a teenager at the next table
was being verbally abusive to his mother. It was terrible. After they left I looked over at another woman sitting near me
and said, "He was being abusive to his mother." And the woman replied, "Oh, I don't think that's abuse." I asked her what
she'd call it if her husband did it to her, and she said, "Now that's abuse." Until parent abuse is named, it will remain hidden, and families will have
difficulty finding help. After recognizing the abuse, parents need a safe place to talk about what they are experiencing.
Talking about the abuse can have a profound impact on parents and help break the isolation. The last talk we had turned my life around. Just talking about it out loud made me realize
that in our attempt to reach her we'd let her call the shots, we'd let her take over our life. It made me see that we needed
to change the relationship between her and us. Parents may want to talk about their experiences with a friend they feel safe with, or with family
members. They need someone who will listen and not minimize the abuse. People without appropriate training may have difficulties
listening to this topic, especially if they have had similar experiences. It may therefore be difficult for parents to find an appropriate person to talk to. It is important for
them to keep looking until they find a supportive listener. Some places to turn to include: Family and friends Support groups Counselling services Parent resource centres Women's resource centres Shelters for battered women Contact names and telephone numbers for these resources may be available at local libraries. When they are dealing with an abusive teen, parents may find a professional counsellor helpful.
Every Canadian has the right to publicly funded mental health services for children, adolescents and their families. However,
public resources for counselling and therapy are scarce and parents may need to go on a scavenger hunt for publicly funded
resources in their area. The local shelter for battered women, the drug dependency service, children's hospital or child welfare
service may have trained counsellors whom parents can consult. If these agencies or organizations can't help, they may be
able to refer parents elsewhere. The choice of a therapist or a counsellor is important. Parents need to "shop around" and find
a counsellor or therapist who knows how to help. Unfortunately, many parents have negative experiences with counsellors: Some therapists assume that parents of teenagers who are out of control are insecure or
inadequate. They assume that parents who appear passive and overwhelmed have always been troubled and conclude that the parents'
symptoms explain why their children are abusing them. When they see people acting passively, they assume that parents are
passive by nature. What they don't see is how behaviour is shaped by relationships, how parents who seem helpless and inept
may have become that way because their resources were slowly exhausted as they tried to cope with impossible situations. Some counsellors say the problem of parent abuse begins with poor parenting practices and a lack
of appropriate boundaries and limits. Parents feel this is an unsatisfactory explanation that leaves them feeling powerless
and vulnerable at a time when they need support to feel strong and capable. Family therapists make you feel it's all your fault. We weren't functioning well as a
family, we didn't need them to tell us that, and we didn't need them to make us feel we weren't doing our job very well. The relationship between a counsellor or therapist and an abused parent should be collaborative
and the therapist should be the parent's ally in the parent's own process. Parents do not always need direction and advice
from a counsellor; more often they need support to strengthen themselves in coming up with good solutions to their problems. It is important that doctors, ministers and other community leaders be informed on this topic and
let parents know they are willing to be allies and listeners, and make time for parents. Support groups can play a significant role in helping parents take concrete steps toward ending
the abuse, and thereby take control of their lives. They can provide an opportunity for parents to realize that they are not
alone in their struggles, and give parents an opportunity to help others in the same situation. This can be crucial for parents
who feel helpless in their own abusive situation because being a source of support for others diminishes the feelings of helplessness. For a support group to be a successful experience, it has to feel right for the parent, and that
often depends on how well the parent "fits" with the other members of the group. The best support groups are often facilitated
by a professional who can help parents move on from their anger. Unfortunately, support groups are few and far between and
receive little or no support, financial or otherwise, from governments or professionals. More effort needs to be put into
creating effective support groups for parents. Mediating between abusive teens and their parents is controversial, but it may be a source of help
in resolving the abusive situation. There is a place for mediation and circle healing, but it has to be in the hands of someone
who knows that the victim is not responsible for the violence. The abusive teen has to be accountable for the abuse. I think we have to look carefully at what the therapeutic community is doing in cases
of adolescent abuse of parents. Mediation with teens and their parents in this context is a dangerous practice. Mediation
is for parties who are equals. An adolescent is not his or her parent's equal. Before there can be any discussion or negotiation,
the perpetrator must take responsibility for the abuse. The first intervention step is for everyone to acknowledge that the
abuse is happening - the professionals, the parents and the adolescents. The goal of any discussion with parents and adolescents
is not to create equality but to establish reasonable parental authority. The abuse can't be mediated. When parents work together as a couple, they feel much stronger. The situation is made far worse
when couples side with the child against each other. Her father and her would sit and whisper, I was the ogre, I was the one keeping her from
doing what she wanted. They'd plan how they were going to get me to let her do things. Uniting with other people who are in the child's life can give parents strength and more control.
Parents have the right to stay in close communication with people who are a part of their child's life, such as parents of
the child's friends, teachers, principals and guidance counsellors, doctors, church leaders, police and probation officers.
This is not "interfering." Once parents recognize they are being abused, they can begin to emotionally separate from their
children and shift the focus to their own needs. It stopped for me when I recognized that this was abuse and I didn't have to put up with
it. When I got unhooked enough to say, "You can't do that to me." You have to know about boundaries and be very clear with
your kids about what they can do to you. Understanding what is happening can help parents make better informed decisions. Parents may find
it useful to familiarize themselves with resources available in their community, legal issues, mental health and drug abuse
issues, and other topics related to parent abuse. Reading about parent abuse also helps some parents: I found it (Parent Abuse leaflet) quite amazing to read because it was describing accurately
what was happening to me and I hadn't seen that described anywhere else. Trying to deal with the problem of abuse may not be possible until the drug or alcohol abuse is
addressed. Parents can educate themselves about drugs and the consequences of teens' use of drugs. Jerome Price suggests that
parents and therapists may find it useful to contact a local adolescent drug treatment centre prior to dealing with a teen's
problem themselves. Many parents in abusive situations feel they are going crazy. Being able to read about parent abuse
helps them to recognize that what they are experiencing is abuse and enables them to take action. It helps parents realize they are being abused, that they are normal and aren't going
crazy and they can look for help. For a while I thought I was going nuts. Setting limits can be a difficult and complex process, often requiring different forms of interventions
for different children. To begin dealing with the long-term issues associated with the abuse, parents need time and space
to: begin taking control of their life assert their right for safety and the safety of their other children start to heal the relationship with the abusive child if possible For some families, removal of the teenager from the home, sometimes for a few hours or a week,
will help the situation. Removal of the teen is a means of escaping the immediate threat of abuse and can also give parents
the time and space to begin dealing with the long-term issues associated with the abuse. Unfortunately, for some parents removal
of the teen on a more permanent basis is the only solution for ending the abuse. Respite care in the form of short-term supervision of the teen by someone other than the parent
could be beneficial in that it gives parents a break from the stress of the situation. However, some parents can focus their
energy only on removing the child from the home and not on finding alternative living arrangements. Either way, when parents
make the decision to remove their abusive child from the home, they need support. It may be necessary to involve the police to maintain safety in the home. It is important that
parents are clear about what the criminal justice system can and cannot do so they have realistic expectations of the system
and can access available supports. The criminal justice system functions with clear parameters. It is mandated to respond to criminal
behaviour, and while some forms of parent abuse are at times difficult for parents to live with, they do not necessarily constitute
an offence under the Criminal Code. Physical abuse, threats, theft and damage to property are criminal offences. However,
few police forces have protocols for dealing with parent abuse. Police involvement sometimes encourages children to understand the severity of their behaviour: The officer struck a perfect balance between being disapproving and strict and being compassionate,
but not overly so. He confronted her in front of me for over an hour, and outlined the consequences of what would happen if
this didn't stop, that she was violating my essential rights as a human being. They told her she would be taken to the police
station and charged with assault or with disrupting the peace, and that she could be placed in a group home. Although that
didn't end the abuse, it stopped the escalation. I would move to the phone and she'd calm down a bit. I think that's what
kept her from actually hitting me. The third time they were there in 10 minutes. I felt that I was in danger. The most helpful
thing they did was take it seriously. They presented it as a very serious thing and she took it seriously. The job of the police is to deal with the immediate emergency, and they should not be expected
to provide long-term solutions. However, calling the police may be part of an overall plan developed by the parents, the police
and other service providers, to end the abuse. Immediately, you can get help from the police. One officer made it clear to me that although
I could call if I was in danger, they can't keep showing up every day and simply calling the police was no solution. I needed
to be addressing the roots of what was happening. Many parents are afraid to call the police because they feel guilty when their children are charged
with assault. They also feel that court orders to attend school or stay at home and follow the rules are seldom supervised
or enforced, and that probation officers are overworked and cannot properly supervise the children under their care. I had her charged. She got eight months' probation and community service, and she had
certain restrictions and conditions like she had to go to school and she wasn't to hit me. She violated every condition of
her probation and they did nothing. I told the probation officer she hit me. I got involved with the justice system only because
I wanted her forced to go into therapy. I didn't want her charged. I wanted her in therapy. The police and the prosecutor
said, "Charge her, it's the best way to get her into therapy." Here we are, six months later, and still no therapy. They lied
to me. Others are afraid to call the police because they have attempted to restrain their children and
fear they may be charged with assault. Some teens erroneously believe they are protected from their parents' authority by
law, and parents live with the threat of being charged with assault, abuse or neglect if they attempt to discipline their
teen. Common controlling comments are "You can't touch me!" "You have to support me until I'm 18." "I'll call Children's Aid
on you!" and "I'll call the police!" Jerome Price (1996) calls these threats "the hammer of the 90s." These youths were misinformed,
but unfortunately their parents believed them: She likes to say that we can't touch her - physically - and also seems to know that the
justice system can't touch her. She'll say things like, "If I get caught they can't do anything with me. They can't prosecute
you until you're 16." What parents need to know is that they have the right - in fact, the responsibility - to control
their children. Obviously, parents should not neglect or use violent means to control their children. When a child threatens
to call the authorities, parents should be willing to call the child's bluff and say, "Do." Some parents regret involving the criminal justice system because they found it even more difficult
to live with the child after assault charges were laid. Others state that they felt less in control and more vulnerable when
the police and the court system were involved. Parents of other racial origins or gay parents and lower income families may
be afraid to seek help from agencies such as the police for fear the child will be subjected to racism, homophobia or some
other form of discrimination. Regaining control begins with naming the problem and then taking the necessary steps, which usually
involve talking to someone and accessing counselling, and sometimes the removal of the child from the home. Immediately after
this, it is normal for the parent to experience a variety of emotions. Some parents experience relief, while others are angry
or depressed, and feel a sense of failure and loss. It is important that they accept their feelings and be gentle with themselves.
Some parents gain inner strength through exercise, meditation or support groups. This helps build their sense of self-worth
and that in turn strengthens their ability to cope with the situation. Even little things like pouring their feelings into
a journal can help parents become stronger. Sometimes the child's attitude shows improvement, and, if the child has left the home, she or he
may want to return. Decision making at this time should not be made out of the parents' feelings of guilt. It is important
that the parents think through what they want so that they can retain their newly found control. They need to be very clear
about what the rules and the consequences for breaking the rules are, and they need to rigidly enforce the consequences. Parents may want to have the child sign a written list of rules such as this one: I agree to do the following: Attend and fully engage in school Keep parents informed about where I am Do chores (e.g. clean up my room). In our house we will always treat each other with respect. This means no physical or verbal abuse.
These things are forbidden in our house: Name calling Hitting, punching, slapping or kicking Damaging other people's property Making threats to hurt myself or anyone else Stealing or borrowing things without permission Playing mind games Insisting others buy things they can't afford Signed:___________________________ Date:________________ Adolescents are likely to make excuses for their abusive behaviour or make empty or dismissive
responses. Parents should recognize these as nothing more than attempts to avoid responsibility. Parents should not accept
these excuses and should carry out the established consequences for breaking the rules. Some common empty phrases teens use
are: Everybody does it. It's not like you haven't done it before. I'll never do it again. It's all your fault. I won't lie to you. Can I go now? Are you finished? It's my life. I can do what I want. I'm sorry. Parents should choose the consequences appropriate for each rule violation. The following are some
possible consequences: Take away the use of the car, phone, stereo, etc. Contact the school daily to meet with teachers. Take away child's allowance or spending money. Parents should ensure that they have support in place to help them stay in control to carry through
with enforcing rules and consequences. Healing and relationship building can continue at the pace the parents are comfortable with. The
ongoing healing includes working through the anger and coming to a place of acceptance. To stop parent abuse, the teens themselves must recognize that their behaviour is abusive. Some
teens find it useful to talk to an adult other than their parents, and others may find it helpful to talk to their peers.
Many of the supports for parents can also be a source of help to the youth. These include: counselling and support groups family friend or relative outreach workers at battered women's shelters. I was in therapy for years, but I didn't really change until my friend said what I was
doing was wrong. Reading materials can also help teens to realize that their behaviours are abusive. I sat down with my daughter and we read the entire booklet through together. It helped
because we went through her behaviours using the categories and descriptions and she was able to label them. I would say,
"You did this, what would you say that is?" and she would say, "That's financial abuse." Or whatever it was. Since then she
has been able to identify her own behaviour as abusive, and after we went through the material she started asking if there
were groups that would help her. Many parents report having difficulty finding appropriate support and express frustration at what
they perceive as severely limited resources. I called everyone in the phone book that I thought could have helped. I exhausted every
avenue I could think of exhausting. There's a considerable lack of resources for parents of children this age. They are very,
very under-serviced. Parents complain that the response time for assistance is far too long. When they finally reach
out for help, parents are often desperate and in situations that require immediate attention. Limited, overburdened resources
mean long waiting periods before help is available. In addition, agencies have specific criteria that exclude many families. Even where these services are available, they are not always accessible. Sometimes, lack of transportation
and child care is a barrier. Parents are not always able to leave the child unsupervised. Parents also find that some of the assistance they are offered creates more problems for the family.
For example, some teens receiving social assistance, in group homes or foster homes, have more freedom and financial support
than their parents can provide. When these lifestyles are experienced by the teens as being more favourable than living with
the rules and limitations at home, conflicts increase between the parents and teens and some adolescents begin to use the
system to their advantage. 43 It was also confusing for the other children. She would flaunt the new clothes she bought
with her Children's Aid allowance in front of them. It really bothered me. She was getting all these things I couldn't afford
for my other kids because she could play the system. Consider yourself the manager of your child's care. Don't depend on anyone else to do this for
you. I think we're going to have to be very watchful and assertive to get whatever help is
available. It doesn't just come to you. A lot depends on what you reach out for. You have to be a discernible person to be
able to access what's out there. You can fall through the cracks pretty easily. Keep a record of your child's behaviours, moods and encounters with the legal and mental health
system, and of your child's medications, dosages and clinical appointments. Note your own conversations with school officials,
specialists and other involved parties and record names, dates and telephone numbers. Keep in mind that professionals are working for you. Respect their position and expertise, but
don't assume they always know best. Pay attention to your inner voice and assert yourself when you think it is necessary. The final
decision is always yours. Do your best to ensure that your child does not fall between the cracks. It may mean making phone
calls and personal visits; it may mean telling the workers that you won't take no for an answer. Find yourself a friend who can be your support person. Feel free to bring this support pal when
you see school teachers, psychiatrists, etc. It helps to talk it through. Tell a friend or family member what you are experiencing in your dealings
with institutions. The above is adapted with kind permission of Mason, Paul and Randi Kreger. Stop Walking On Eggshells.
Oakland, Calif.: New Harbinger Publications, 1998. Educating people to recognize and name abuse is essential to stopping parent abuse. It's a very, very touchy subject. Recently a woman said, "Don't talk so foolish," when
I suggested she was being abused by her son. They don't always recognize that it's not okay, they don't have to put up with
it, so they can't stop it. At the time parents are experiencing abuse, they may not have the time, energy or desire to organize
others. When they are in crisis, community awareness is not their primary concern. After moving out of the crises, some parents
may not wish to talk about their experiences publicly. However, parents may wish to join with other concerned people to promote
community awareness. Some of the things parents can do to oppose parent abuse are: Discuss the issue with friends and family. Persuade a local organization (such as a church or community centre) to offer support groups.
Start a group for teens. Distribute materials or offer to talk to groups and organizations in the community such as churches,
parent resource centres and women's shelters. Encourage schools to have children do projects on the topic and ask teachers to address the issue
of parent abuse in the classroom. Groups for young people, encouraging them to have fun in a group. That would be a better
sense of community. I ordered it for a client in victim services who had gone to the police with a complaint
against her daughter for physical assault. I liked that we were encouraged to photocopy it and distribute it to others. My
colleagues were intrigued. This was fabulous for people in child welfare. I have been passing it on to clients as a front-line
worker and with other people working in the same area. Community action requires organization and hard work. In our community they go so far and that's it. We try to get a youth group going, but
it's so hard. We need a facilitator, an outreach worker to work with us and get it established so people who work and are
dealing with the problem don't have to take it on. If the government doesn't think about these small little things it will
be the worse for us all because this is our future, this is tomorrow. In most communities, the issue of parent abuse is rarely discussed in public. A one-day workshop
could help to bring the issue out into the open. Parents or others who are concerned about the issue of parent abuse could
encourage an existing organization or a group to help pull together a committee of people who will design and organize the
workshop. Police officers, social workers, therapists, community health nurses and legal aid workers may be interested in
getting together to talk about the topic. Often, when people begin to pool their experiences, they find that collectively
they have a great deal of knowledge about the topic. Some questions that could be discussed at the workshop are: What is parent abuse and who are the perpetrators and the victims? Who is most at risk (mothers, fathers, single parents) and why? Does abuse by boys and girls differ in form or frequency? At what ages does the abuse start? How prevalent is this problem? What forms does the violence take? What causes the abuse? Is there a connection between parent abuse and other forms of abuse? Has the teen witnessed violence in the family? Is there a link between this form of violence and violence in the culture? How do families cope?
Where do parents and teens turn for help? What kind of help do they receive? What strategies have victimized parents found helpful? What resources and tools do parents and counsellors need? How can the abuse be prevented or lessened? What responsibility is taken by professionals? What is the attitude of professionals toward this issue? Who is addressing the issue? How can they better address this issue? The following are sessions which worked successfully at a conference held
in Halifax in 1996: Morning Sessions Welcome and Introductions Panel Presentation: A parent and two therapists gave 10-minute talks and answered questions from participants. Small Group Discussion: Is the abuse of parents by their teenage children an issue in our community? Is there more violence toward parents now than in the past? Why is this happening? After the group discussions, brief reports were shared. Afternoon Sessions Panel Presentation: Representatives from local counselling agencies, the shelter for battered women, and the police
gave 10-minute talks and answered questions from participants. Small Group Discussion: Why don't people talk about this issue? How can we make it a public issue? A skit dramatizing a variety of forms of parent abuse and the effect on the parent was performed
by a parents' group. Closure: Invite participants to share one thing they will take away from the day. Ambert, Anne-Marie. The Effect of Children on Parents. New York: Hayworth Press, 1992. Ambert, Anne-Marie. Parents, Children, and Adolescents: Interactive Relationships and Development
in Context. New York: Hayworth Press, 1997. Barkley, Jacqueline. "Reclaiming our children: teachers as elders" in Daily Meaning: Counternarratives
of Teachers' Work. Neilsen, Allan R. (editor). Halifax: Bendall Books, 1999. Barkley, Jacqueline. "The politics of parenting
and the youth crisis" in Power and Resistance: Critical Thinking About Canadian Social Issues, Second Edition. Samuelson,
Les and Wayne Anthony (editors). Halifax: Fernwood Publishing, 1998. Cottrell, Barbara and Mary Anne Finlayson. Parent Abuse: The Abuse of Parents by Their Teenage
Children. Report and booklet. 1996. Mason, Paul and Randi Kreger. Stop Walking On Eggshells. Oakland, Calif.: New Harbinger
Publications, 1998. Monk, Peter. "Adolescent-To-Parent Violence: A Qualitative Analysis of Emerging Themes." (Unpublished
thesis: 1997.) Price, Jerome. Power and Compassion: Working with Difficult Adolescents and Abused Parents.
New York: Guilford Press, 1996. Cited in Shulman, Shmuel and Inge Seiffge-Krenge. Fathers and Adolescents: Developmental and Clinical Perspectives. London and
New York: Routledge. 1997. "Canada's Alcohol & Other Drugs Survey, 1994," reported in the 1999 Statistical Report on the Health of Canadians prepared
by the Federal, Provincial & Territorial Advsiory Committee on Population Health, Published by Health Canada, 1994. Health Behaviours in School Aged Children (HBSC) surveys. Conducted in Canada in 1989-90; 1993-94; and 1997-98. These surveys are administered
every four years to a representative sample of youth (11, 13 & 15 years of age) in participating countries. In the 1998
survey, 28 countries participated. The report summarizes trends in the health of Canadian youth over three surveys between
1990 and 1998. The section "Parenting has been stolen from parents" is based on the work of Jacqueline Barkley and Anne-Marie Ambert
WORLD NEWS IN A CHAOS I try not to watch the news as much as possible; however, it is obvious why I have too. There are so many issues out there
and on some of them it's just really hard to decide what's right or wrong; we come to a stalemate on our opinion; I know that
I have many times on certain issues Here are some of the issues that I'm not confused on. I would like feedback from my readers to see if they agree,
disagree or perhaps feel the same way. Gas gouging in America. Here is an issue I'm definately not confused about. I really don't trust President
Bush to do his best in this matter. After all, he does own quite a few oil fields himself and lowering gas prices would
not be in his best interest. We have the resources yet we are being raped so to speak. The Oil Companies, Chevron and Exxon have made $4 Billion to $8 Billion dollars, and yet none of us can really afford
to fill up our tanks anymore. Bee County in Texas is BOYCOTTING Exxon/Mobile starting Monday. I urge my readers to do the same, take a stand for our
rights as Americans, be heard, go to the leaders of your county, flood the Whitehouse with E-mail, make the politicians listen
to the people they work for. If the Whitehouse is flooded with E-mail about gas prices then they will have no choice but to
listen. Star Spangled Banner It's just wrong no matter how you look at it. If you immagrate to our country then you can't have your own version
of our National Anthem. Go home is my advice to those who sing that song; it is not and nor will it ever be any part of our
National Anthem. Ruiz made a statement on MSNBC that the words were changed because it doesn't always mean the same
to other people and he was trying to teach his people. OK, none of that even made sense to me. It would seem to me that you have to be taught our history to "understand"
the words to the Star Spangled Banner. The battles our country, the struggles we have endured; past and present.
Our men and woman who gave their lives for our freedom "THE BOMBS BURSING IN AIR GAVE PROOF THROUGH THE NIGHT THAT OUR
FLAG WAS STILL THERE". It is our heritage in our National Anthem. I am completely insulted. You just can't walk into our country and be a Citizen, it doesn't work that way. My Great Grandfather, Pietro Tassone,
waited for his turn to come to this country. He boarded a ship at age 17 and came to Ellis Island. He became a
citizen, and expected nothing more then what he worked for. He lived in PA for awhile then went to California and opened
a bakery and stayed there till he died at the age of 89. He worked hard all of his life, never went on Welfare and
he was grateful for the opportunity to be in the Land of the Free and Home of the Brave. It's an honor to become
and be a Citizen of the United States, it is not something we owe to anyone. My family is all military, my father, Gerry Tassone was a Captain in the Marine Corp, his brothers were Army and Marines.
My sister, Retired TSgt Debra Tudich Air Force, her sons, Navy and Air Force, My Uncle Joe fought in WWII, his son,
my cousin Ernie fought with the Army in Viet Nam, my little cousin Michael Navy, my cousin Josh Army, and finally my only
son Matthew is joining the Army. They fought and will fight for the United States, not Mexico or any other country. They
defend us from any entity that is a threat to OUR country. Freedom isn't free and it is sons and daughters of our country that die for this freedom, they are not taking bullets and
getting killed so that you can demand entrance into this country. So let's get it strait and be blunt. Anybody who thinks that it is their privlage and right to enter our country
at will is so full of of themselves. It is not your right to do this, it was not your place to replace the words of our National
Anthem. Clearly, you do not know what it means to be an American and clearly that makes me believe that you don't belong here
at all.
DEFINITION: TYPES OF LUPUS: There are three types of lupus: discoid, systemic, and drug-induced. Discoid (cutaneous) lupus is always limited to the skin. It is identified by a rash that may appear on the face,
neck, and scalp. Discoid lupus is diagnosed by examining a biopsy of the rash. In discoid lupus the biopsy will show abnormalities
that are not found in skin without the rash. Discoid lupus does not generally involve the body's internal organs. Therefore,
the ANA test may be negative in patients with discoid lupus. However, in a large number of patients with discoid lupus, the
ANA test is positive, but at a low level or "titer." Systemic lupus is usually more severe than discoid lupus, and can affect almost any organ or organ system
of the body. For some people, only the skin and joints will be involved. In others, the joints, lungs, kidneys, blood, or
other organs and/or tissues may be affected. Generally, no two people with systemic lupus will have identical symptoms. Systemic
lupus may include periods in which few, if any, symptoms are evident ("remission") and other times when the disease becomes
more active ("flare"). Most often when people mention "lupus," they are referring to the systemic form of the disease. Drug-induced lupus occurs after the use of certain prescribed drugs. The symptoms of drug-induced lupus are similar
to those of systemic lupus. The drugs most commonly connected with drug-induced lupus are hydralazine (used to treat high
blood pressure or hypertension) and procainamide (used to treat irregular heart rhythms). Drug induced lupus is more common
in men who are given these drugs more often. However, not everyone who takes these drugs will develop drug-induced lupus.
Only about 4 percent of the people who take these drugs will develop the antibodies suggestive of lupus. Of those 4 percent,
only an extremely small number will develop overt drug-induced lupus. The symptoms usually fade when the medications are discontinued.
For most people, lupus is a mild disease affecting only a few organs. For others, it may cause serious and even life-threatening
problems. More than 16,000 Americans develop lupus each year. It is estimated that 500,000 to 1.5 million Americans have been
diagnosed with lupus. CAUSE: Although lupus is known to occur within families, there is no known gene or genes which are thought to cause
the illness. There are recent discoveries of a gene on chromosome 1 which is associated with lupus in certain families. Previously,
genes on chromosome 6 called "immune response genes" were also associated with the disease. Only 10 percent of lupus patients
will have a close relative (parent or sibling) who already has or may develop lupus. Statistics show that only about 5% of
the children born to individuals with lupus will develop the illness. Lupus is often called a "woman's disease" despite the fact that many men are affected. Lupus can occur at any
age, and in either sex, although it occurs 10-15 times more frequently among adult females than among adult males after puberty
or after the emergence into sexual maturity. The symptoms of the disease are the same in men and women. People of African,
American Indian, and Asian origin are thought to develop the disease more frequently than Caucasian women. The reasons for
this ethnic selection are not clear. Hormonal factors may explain why lupus occurs more frequently in females than in males. The increase of disease
symptoms before menstrual periods and/or during pregnancy support the belief that hormones, particularly estrogen, may somewhat
regulate the way the disease progresses. However, the exact reason for the greater prevalence of lupus in women, and the cyclic
increase in symptoms, is unknown. SYMPTOMS OF LUPUS: Table 1
DIAGNOSIS: Table 2
LABORATORY TESTS USED IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF LUPUS: The first laboratory test ever devised was the LE (lupus Erythematosus) cell test. When the test is repeated many times,
it is eventually positive in about 90 percent of the people with systemic lupus. Unfortunately, the LE cell test is not specific
for systemic lupus (despite the official-sounding name) and is rarely used today. The test can also be positive in up to 20
percent of the people with rheumatoid arthritis, in some patients with other rheumatic conditions like Sjogren's syndrome
or scleroderma, in patients with liver disease, and in persons taking certain drugs (such as procainamide, hydralazine, and
others). The immunofluorescent antinuclear antibody (ANA or FANA) test is more specific for lupus than the LE cell prep test. The
ANA test is positive in virtually all people with systemic lupus. If the ANA test comes back negative it is considered a normal
result, and it is very good evidence against lupus as an explanation for the symptoms. If the ANA test result comes back above
the normal range the test is said to be positive. A positive ANA test by itself is not proof of lupus. The ANA is only a test
and like a high cholesterol value, a positive ANA doesn't necessarily equate having a disease. The ANA test may also be positive
in individuals: Because it can be positive in conditions other than lupus, the results of the ANA test have to be interpreted in light
of the patient's medical history, as well as the current clinical signs and symptoms. ANA test reports include a titer (or strength) of the antibody. The titer indicates how many times an individual's blood
must be diluted to get a sample free of anti-nuclear antibodies. Thus, a titer of 1:640 shows a greater concentration of anti-nuclear
antibodies than a titer of 1:320 or 1:160. A high titer of this antibody (greater than 1:1280) is usually associated with
rheumatic disease but has nothing to do with how active a person's lupus is. Therefore, it is not necessary to repeat the
ANA in someone who has lupus. Other blood tests (complement factors C3 and C4, anti-DNA, the complete blood count, and urinalysis)
are the best laboratory index of lupus activity. Complement is a blood protein that, with antibodies, destroys bacteria. It is an "amplifier" of immune function. If the
total blood complement level is low, or the C3 or C4 complement values are low, and the person also has a positive ANA, some
weight is added to the diagnosis of lupus. Low C3 and C4 complement levels in individuals with positive ANA test results may
also be indicative of lupus kidney disease. Tests of individual antigen antibody reactions have been developed which are very helpful in the diagnosis of SLE. These
include the anti-DNA antibody test, the anti-Sm antibody test, the anti-RNP antibody test, the anti-Ro antibody test, and
tests which measure serum complement levels. These tests can be further explained by your physician. Detection of antibodies to phospholipid, such as the anticardiolipin assay or a positive lupus anticoagulant can be cause
for concern especially if the patient has evidence of blood clots (thromboses). The most common manifestation of this is phlebitis
or inflammation of the vessels in the calves of the legs. Presence of these antibodies in the absence of any abnormal clotting
may require simple aspirin therapy to mildly thin the blood. However, evidence of abnormal blood clotting may require that
the patient take a blood thinner like heparin and later warfarin to prevent blockage of small and large blood vessels. When
blockage occurs in the lung or the brain it can be very serious. Laboratory tests are most useful when one remembers the following information. Many patients may present with vague symptoms and only a positive antiphospholipid (APL) antibody or a lupus anticoagulant.
A person may only have positive antiphospholipid antibodies and be diagnosed with primary antiphospholipid syndrome
instead of lupus. People with primary APL syndrome might still have problems with premature clotting of blood and require
treatment. Physicians will sometimes also perform skin biopsies of both the individual's rashes and his or her normal skin. These
biopsies can help diagnose systemic lupus in about 75 percent of patients. A kidney biopsy is sometimes required if urine or blood evaluations show evidence of kidney disease. Kidney abnormalities
vary with each patient. A biopsy and special preparation of the biopsy sample is required to give the doctor an idea of the
degree and type of kidney injury. Using the biopsy results the doctor can tailor therapy for each individual. The interpretation of all these positive or negative tests, and their relationship to symptoms, is frequently difficult.
A test may be positive one time and negative another time, reflecting the relative activity of the disease or other variables.
When questions cannot be resolved, consult an expert in lupus. When someone has many symptoms and signs of lupus and has positive tests for lupus, physicians have little problem making
a correct diagnosis and initiating treatment. However, a more common problem occurs when an individual has vague, seemingly
unrelated symptoms of achy joints, fever, fatigue, or pains. Some doctors may think the person is neurotic. Others may try
different drugs in the hope of suppressing the symptoms. Fortunately, with growing awareness of lupus, an increasing number
of physicians will consider the possibility of lupus in the diagnosis. A patient can help the doctor by being open and honest. A healthy dialogue between the patient and doctor results in better
medical care, not only for people with lupus, but for anyone seeking medical treatment. To whom should a person go for a diagnosis of lupus? Most individuals usually seek the help of their family doctor first,
and this is often sufficient. However, when unresolved questions arise or complications develop, another opinion from a specialist
may be advisable. The choice of specialist depends on the problem. For example, you would see a nephrologist for a kidney
problem or a dermatologist for a skin problem. Most often, a rheumatologist or clinical immunologist specializing in lupus
is recommended. Referrals can be made through your family doctor, the local medical society, or the local Lupus Foundation
of America chapter FLARES (WHAT TRIGGERS LUPUS?) What triggers an attack of lupus in a susceptible person? Scientists have noted common features in many lupus
patients. In some, exposure to the sun causes sudden development of a rash and then possibly other symptoms. In others an
infection, perhaps a cold or a more serious infection, does not get better, and then complications arise. These complications
may be the first signs of lupus. In still other cases, a drug taken for some illness produces the signaling symptoms. In some
women, the first symptoms and signs develop during pregnancy. In others, they appear soon after delivery. Many people cannot
remember or identify any specific factor. Obviously, many seemingly unrelated factors can trigger the onset of the disease. TREATMENT: For the vast majority of people with lupus, effective treatment can minimize symptoms, reduce inflammation,
and maintain normal bodily functions. Preventive measures can reduce the risk of flares. For photosensitive patients, avoidance of (excessive) sun
exposure and/or the regular application of sun screens will usually prevent rashes. Regular exercise helps prevent muscle
weakness and fatigue. Immunization protects against specific infections. Support groups, counseling, talking to family members,
friends, and physicians can help alleviate the effects of stress. Needless to say, negative habits are hazardous to people
with lupus. These include smoking, excessive consumption of alcohol, too much or too little of prescribed medication, or postponing
regular medical checkups. Treatment approaches are based on the specific needs and symptoms of each person. Because the characteristics
and course of lupus may vary significantly among people, it is important to emphasize that a thorough medical evaluation and
ongoing medical supervision are essential to ensure proper diagnosis and treatment. Medications are often prescribed for people with lupus, depending on which organ(s) are involved, and the severity
of involvement. Effective patient-physician discussions regarding the selection of medication, its possible side effects,
and any changes in doses are vital. Commonly prescribed medications include: Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs): These medications are prescribed for a variety
of rheumatic diseases, including lupus. Examples of such compounds include acetylsalicylic acid (e.g., aspirin), ibuprofen
(Motrin), naproxen (Naprosyn), indomethacin (Indocin), nabumetone (Relafen), tolmetin (Tolectin), and a large number of others.
These drugs are usually recommended for muscle and joint pain, and arthritis. Aspirin and NSAIDs may cause stomach upsets
for some people. This effect can be minimized by taking them with meals, milk, antacids, or prostaglandins such as misoprostil
(Cytotec). Newer NSAIDs contain a prostaglandin in the same capsule (Arthrotec). The other NSAIDs work in the same way as
aspirin, but may be more potent, and patients often require fewer pills per day to have the same effect as aspirin. Many NSAIDs
are now available in "over the counter" forms. Patients should be cautious about taking too much aspirin or NSAID since too
many of these can reduce the blood flow to the kidney and cause problems. Acetaminophen: Acetaminophen (e.g., Tylenol) is a mild analgesic that can often be used for pain.
It has the advantage of less stomach irritation than aspirin, but it is not nearly as effective at suppressing inflammation
as aspirin. Corticosteroids: Corticosteroids (steroids) are hormones that have anti-inflammatory and immunoregulatory
properties. They are normally produced in small quantities by the adrenal gland. This hormone controls a variety of metabolic
functions in the body. Synthetically produced corticosteroids are used to reduce inflammation and suppress activity of the
immune system. The most commonly prescribed drug of this type is Prednisone. Because steroids have a variety of side effects, the dose has to be regulated to maximize the beneficial anti-immune/anti-inflammatory
effects and minimize the negative side effects. Side effects occur more frequently when steroids are taken over long periods
of time at high doses (for example, 60 milligrams of Prednisone taken daily for periods of more than one month). Such side
effects include weight gain, a round face, acne, easy bruising, "thinning" of the bones (osteoporosis), high blood pressure,
cataracts, onset of diabetes, increased risk of infection, stomach ulcers, hyperactivity, and an increase of appetite. Antimalarials: Chloroquine (Aralen) or hydroxychloroquine (Plaquenil), commonly used in the treatment
of malaria, may also be very useful in some individuals with lupus. They are most often prescribed for skin and joint symptoms
of lupus. It may take months before these drugs demonstrate a beneficial effect. Side effects are rare, and consist of occasional
diarrhea or rashes. Some antimalarial drugs, such as quinine and chloroquine, can affect the eyes. Therefore, it is important
to see an eye doctor (ophthalmologist) regularly. The manufacturer suggests an eye exam before starting the drug and one exam
every six months thereafter. However, your physician might suggest a yearly exam is sufficient. Immunomodulating Drugs: Azathioprine (Imuran) and cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan) are in a group of
agents known as cytotoxic or immunosuppressive drugs. These drugs act in a similar manner to the corticosteroid drugs in that
they suppress inflammation and tend to suppress the immune system. The side effects of these drugs include anemia, low white
blood cell count, and increased risk of infection. Their use may also predispose an individual to developing cancer later
in life. Other agents like methotrexate and cyclosporin are used to control the symptoms of lupus. Both are immunomodulating
drugs which have their own side effects. These drugs are still in the investigational phase for lupus. Some of these agents
are used in conjunction with apheresis, a blood filtering treatment. Apheresis has been tried by itself in an effect to remove
specific antibodies from the blood but the results have not been promising. Newer agents are directed toward specific cells of the immune system. These include agents which block the
production of specific antibodies like those against DNA, or agents which act to suppress the manufacture of antibodies through
other mechanisms. Examples of this are intravenous immunoglobulin injections which are given on a regular basis to increase
platelets (particles important to coagulation). Anticoagulants: These drugs are employed to thin the blood, or in actuality to prevent blood
from clotting rapidly. They range from aspirin at very low dose which prevents platelets from sticking, to heparin/coumadin
which actually prevent the blood from clotting. The latter requires careful monitoring to insure that the patient is in the
"therapeutic range" or that the blood is not excessively "thin". Generally, such therapy is life-long in people with lupus
and follows an actual episode of clotting (embolus or thromboses). People with lupus should learn to recognize early symptoms of disease activity. In that way they
can help the physician know when a change in therapy is needed. Regular monitoring of the disease by laboratory tests can
be valuable because noticeable symptoms may occur only after the disease has significantly flared. Changes in blood test results
may indicate the disease is becoming active even before the patient develops symptoms of a flare. Generally, it seems that
the earlier such flares are detected, the more easily they can be controlled. Also, early treatment may decrease the chance
of permanent tissue or organ damage and reduce the time one must remain on high doses of drugs. NUTRITION AND DIET: Although much is still not known about the nutritional factors in many kinds of disease, no one questions the
necessity of a well-balanced diet. Fad diets, advocating an excess or an exclusion of certain types of foods, are much more
likely to be detrimental than beneficial in any disease, including lupus. Scientists have shown that both antibodies and other
cells of the immune system may be adversely affected by nutritional deficiencies or imbalances. Thus, significant deviations
from a balanced diet may have profound effects on a network as complex as the immune system. There have been suggestions about various foods and the treatment of lupus. One example is fish oil. However,
these diets have been used only in animals with limited success and should not become the mainstay of a person's diet. PREGNANCY AND LUPUS: A question of concern to many families is whether or not a young woman with lupus should risk becoming pregnant.
The current general view is that there is no absolute reason why a woman with lupus should not get pregnant, unless she has
moderate to severe organ involvement (i.e., central nervous system, kidney, or heart and lungs) which would place her (the
mother) at risk. However, there is some increased risk of disease activity during or immediately after (3 to 4 weeks) pregnancy.
If a person is monitored carefully, the danger can be minimized. A pregnant woman with lupus should be closely followed by
both her obstetrician and her "lupus doctor." As mentioned earlier in the brochure, a condition called the antiphospholipid syndrome can be secondary to lupus
and may complicate pregnancy. Antibodies against specific auto antigens commonly present on coagulation factors can cause
blood to clot faster than normal or in some cases, not at all. Antiphospholipid antibodies can be found in many patients with
lupus and pose a particular risk to pregnant lupus patients since their presence is often associated with miscarriages. PROGNOSIS: The idea that lupus is generally a fatal disease is one of the gravest misconceptions about this illness. In fact, the
prognosis of lupus is much better today than ever before. It is true that medical science has not yet developed a method for curing lupus and some people do die from the disease.
However, people with non-organ threatening disease can look forward to a normal lifespan if they Although some people with lupus have severe recurrent attacks and are frequently hospitalized, most people with lupus rarely
require hospitalization. There are many lupus patients who never have to be hospitalized, especially if they are careful and
follow their physician's instructions. New research brings unexpected findings each year. The progress made in treatment and diagnosis during the last decade
has been greater than that made over the past 100 years. It is therefore a sensible idea to maintain control of a disease
that tomorrow may be curable. The Lupus Foundation of America the Lupus Foundation of America (LFA) is the nation's leading non-profit voluntary health organization dedicated
to finding the causes and cure for lupus. Our mission is to improve the diagnosis and treatment of lupus, support individuals
and families affected by the disease, increase awareness of lupus among health professionals and the public, and find the
causes and cure. Research, education, and patient services are at the heart of LFA's programs. The Lupus Foundation of America is the only nationwide organization exclusively serving individuals, families
and friends affected by lupus. The LFA has local chapters and support groups throughout the United States, as well as international
affiliates around the world. Contact the LFA or the chapter that serves your area to find out how you can become involved in our mission. Become a Lupus E-Advocate and help pass federal legislation that will benefit people with lupus. You'll receive periodic advocacy updates and other
breaking lupus news and information. Sign up to be on our mailing list. Periodically, the LFA will send information about developments in research, education and awareness activities, updates
about new programs, products and services, as well as news about new basic and clinical studies. Click here to read our privacy policy. SATAN IS ALIVE AND WELL IN MICHAEL NEWDOW REMEMBER HIS NAME AND FACE BECAUSE IT IS THE FACE OF SATAN ALIVE AND WELL IN THE HUMAN RACE
AND GROWING STRONGER EVERYDAY WITH THE HELP OF PEOPLE LIKE MICHAEL NEWDOW.
"An atheist who sued because he did not want his young daughter exposed to the words "under
God" in the Pledge of Allegiance has filed another lawsuit -- this time with other parents." Quite honestly, a better Christian person then myself will say everyone has the right to believe as he/she wishes
just have that same respect for others. However, I am so sick of the Michael Newdow's of the world. I am sick of them infringing on my right to say prayer or mention
the word "God" in public school. Just as they have rights, so does the rest of the world. I am sick of being afraid
I'm going to offend someone. In fact, I am one of the few who have brought up God's name in my child's school in his
classroom because it IS MY RIGHT TO BELIEVE AS I WISH, TO SHOUT GOD'S NAME AT THE TOP OF MY LUNGS IF THAT IS WHAT I WANT.
I don't have to hide what I believe just because it offends someone else. Obviously, they have no problem offending
me by trying to take God out of the Pledge of Allegiance and Prayer out of school. One good turn deserves another. I It's time that all Christians stand up and tell these people that they have offended us. What these people don't realize is that the very Constitution that allows them to speak as they believe was built on the
foundation of the Bilbe. You find the Bible everywhere in the Supreme Court and it's even in the Constitution "God given
right" HELOOOOOOOOOOOOO. The very basis of our society is built on the Constituion which in turn is built on the Bible and I quote: Alexander Hamilton (1757-1804) was a cosigner and "ratifier" of the U.S. Constitution and the first
Secretary of the Treasury. "For my own part, I sincerely esteem it a system which without the finger of
God, never could have been suggested and agreed upon by such a diversity of interests." - "One Nation Under God," by
Christine F. Hart, 1787. I believe in one God, the Father, eternally existing, who is a Spirit, a personal Being of supreme intelligence, knowledge,
love, justice, power and authority. He, through Jesus Christ, is the Creator
of the heavens and the earth and all that is in them. He is the Source of life and the One for whom human life exists. I
believe in one Lord, Jesus Christ of Nazareth, who is the Word and has eternally existed. I believe that He
is the Messiah, the Christ, the divine Son of the living God, conceived of the Holy Spirit, born in the human flesh of the
virgin Mary. I believe that it is by Him that God created all things and that without Him was not anything
made that was made. I believe in the Holy Spirit, as the Spirit of God and of Christ Jesus. The Holy Spirit is
the power of God and the Spirit of life eternal. I believe that Jesus Christ was hung on the cross and died for our sins. That our sins were forgiven at that very
moment of his death. I believe that Jesus Christ is the one and only true Son of God. I believe that Jesus Christ
is my Savior.
Repeat police visits to cost owners SANDUSKY -- A new city nuisance law will allow Sandusky police to charge property owners for going to homes or
businesses where offenses occur repeatedly, according to action at Monday's City Commission meeting. 911? By Christina Tucker Let's examine this new ordinance for a moment. What they are really saying is that from now on if you call 911 more then
once in a month Sandusky will consider you to be a nuisance? So ladies, if you're ex doesn't leave you alone and he's
a dangerous man, and you have called the police before on him are you going to think twice about calling if he's outside threatening
to break down your door? I thought the police had this ability to perform an action called "ARREST"? Common sense says that "underprivalaged"
neighborhoods are going to be the neighborhoods that are hit hardest, which in turn means the poorer class of Sandusky
are going to be hit with fines. So, if they're in trouble they have to think twice about calling the police because,
they have to pay the police for what they currently get paid to do, "protect the public". This article amused me so much that I sent it on to the L.A. Times and the Phoenix Gazette. Imagine the "REVENUE"
big cities like L.A., Phoenix and New York City could bring in if they charged people for "nuisance" calls. "The new rule allows the city to charge the cost of police response to the same location for repeat calls
of ''nuisance'' offenses, according to the ordinance. The nuisance offenses involve littering, animals, alcohol, sex offenses,
theft, handguns, noise, fireworks and other activities, according to the ordinance." The above just about covers everything. As long as noone is raped, robbed, stabbed, held at gunpoint,
and/or any other illegal activitivity I guess you'll be safe in calling the Police. Sandusky will end up getting sued over this if anyone gets wise and calls the Amercian Civil Liberties Union,
and/or any other agency that protects the rights of the U.S. Citizens. 9-11 I can't help myself I have to say it. In the recent past I've thought to myself, "why are
we still in Iraq? Why do we have to pay the price for Iraq"? WELL............................................... I stumbled
across a website that I urge each and every true American to visit. Watching the Twin Towers fall disturbs me because of all the innocent people who parished, some
in a blink of an eye their lives were snuffed out, and some knew they weren't making it out alive. It disturbs me because my Country was attacked that day, my countries Pentagon was attacked and
they tried to destroy my Government by attacking the White House. It disturbs me because people who are "professionals" think we shouldn't have to view our Towers
falling to the ground. It disturbs me that anyone out there wouldn't back our President. Let me disturb you for a moment: I say bring them all to their knees then think about rebuilding.
Look what we did to Japan and Germany. We took it then we freed them then we rebuilt them. We eliminated
the enemy. I don't get people, threat is nothing new to the USA. I read a speech by Franklin D. Roosevelt
and I've included excerpts from it at the end of this article. I will only say this, "The best leaders of our
time did not bow down to anyone who threatened the United States, threats included dictator's and monsters overseas, even
back then. If they were a threat to our way of life, well history tells that story" In closing I say "HAIL TO THE CHIEF. THANK YOU PRESIDENT BUSH FOR NOT BOWING DOWN AND
LETTING THE COWARDS THINK THEY WOULD WALK AWAY AFTER WHAT THEY DID ON 9-11. KICK THEIR ASS AND KICK IT THE OLD
FASHION TEXAS WAY. MAKE THEM WISH THEY WOULD HAVE NEVER UTTERED THE NAME OF OUR GREAT COUNTRY IN THEIR MOUTHS.
MOSTLY, MAKE THEM PAY FOR THE LIVES AND THE WAY OF LIFE THEY STOLED ON THAT DAY. delivered 6 January, 1941 Franklin D. Roosevelt: The Four Freedoms "Let us say to the democracies: "We Americans
are vitally concerned in your defense of freedom. We are putting forth our energies, our resources, and
our organizing powers to give you the strength to regain and maintain a free world. We shall send you in
ever-increasing numbers, ships, planes, tanks, guns. This is our purpose and our pledge." In fulfillment of this purpose we will not
be intimidated by the threats of dictators that they will regard as a breach of international law or as an act of war our
aid to the democracies which dare to resist their aggression. Such aid is not an act of war, even if a
dictator should unilaterally proclaim it so to be. And when the dictators—if the dictators--are
ready to make war upon us, they will not wait for an act of war on our part." "A free nation has the right to expect full
cooperation from all groups. A free nation has the right to look to the leaders of business, of labor and
of agriculture to take the lead in stimulating effort, not among other groups but within their own groups. The best way of dealing with the few slackers
or trouble-makers in our midst is, first, to shame them by patriotic example, and if that fails, to use the sovereignty of
government to save government." The basic things expected by our people of
their political and economic systems are simple. They are: Equality of opportunity for youth and for
others. Jobs for those who can work. Security for those who need it. The ending of special privilege for the few. The preservation of civil liberties for all. The enjoyment of the fruits of scientific
progress in a wider and constantly rising standard of living. These are the simple, the basic things that
must never be lost sight of in the turmoil and unbelievable complexity of our modern world. The inner and
abiding straight of our economic and political systems is dependent upon the degree to which they fulfill these expectations. Many subjects connected with our social economy
call for immediate improvement. As examples: We should bring more citizens under the coverage
of old-age pensions and unemployment insurance. We should widen the opportunities for adequate
medical care. We should plan a better system by which persons
deserving or needing gainful employment may obtain it. I have called for personal sacrifice, and
I am assured of the willingness of almost all Americans to respond to that call. A part of the sacrifice
means the payment of more money in taxes. In my budget message I will recommend that a greater portion
of this great defense program be paid for from taxation than we are paying for today. No person should
try, or be allowed to get rich out of the program, and the principle of tax payments in accordance with ability to pay should
be constantly before our eyes to guide our legislation. If the Congress maintains these principles
the voters, putting patriotism ahead pocketbooks, will give you their applause. In the future days, which we seek to make
secure, we look forward to a world founded upon four essential human freedoms. The first is freedom of speech and expression--everywhere
in the world. The second is
freedom of every person to worship God in his own way everywhere in the world. The third is freedom from want, which, translated
into world terms, means economic understandings which will secure to every nation a healthy peacetime life for its inhabitants--everywhere
in the world. The fourth is freedom from fear, which, translated
into world terms, means a world-wide reduction of armaments to such a point and in such a thorough fashion that no nation
will be in a position to commit an act of physical aggression against any neighbor -- anywhere in the world. That is no vision of a distant millennium.
It is a definite basis for a kind of world attainable in our own time and generation. That kind
of world is the very antithesis of the so-called “new order” of tyranny which the dictators seek to create with
the crash of a bomb. To that new order we oppose the greater conception
-- the moral order. A good society is able to face schemes of world domination and foreign revolutions
alike without fear. Since the beginning of our American history
we have been engaged in change, in a perpetual, peaceful revolution, a revolution which goes on steadily, quietly adjusting
itself to changing conditions without the concentration camp or the quicklime in the ditch. The world order
which we seek is the cooperation of free countries, working together in a friendly, civilized society. This nation has placed its destiny in the
hands, heads and hearts of its millions of free men and women, and its faith in freedom under the guidance of God.
Freedom means the supremacy of human rights everywhere. Our support goes to those who struggle to
gain those rights and keep them. Our strength is our unity of purpose. To that high concept there can be no end
save victory. THE FOLLOWING IS MY OPINION: These problems in our society didn't just
happen during President Bush's administration. These have been on-going problems since the birth of our nation.
War, poverty, underprivileged, threats against
our nation, dictators from other nations, famine. Now we move up the time table and the list hasn't really changed,
however, we've added Deficit, Social Security issues, lack of appropriate medical coverage for the poor, (*underprivileged*?),
famine, whole herds of cattle being wiped out by disease, humans being wiped out by disease, yesteryear it was the Black Plague
and today it's AIDS and a thousand other kinds of cancer. People need to look at the reality.
It's very easy to point fingers and blame, after all, that is human nature. If we were going to do so, much as I loved
President Clinton, it was his administration that should have put the "breaks" on Bin Laden and Sadam. http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/fdrthefourfreedoms.htm
BLUE SKY RESTAURAUNT A GREAT PLACE TO EAT AND BRING YOUR FAMILY Located at 917 N. Leavitt Rd Amherst Ohio 440-984-2583 When you first walk in the doors you enter a warm and friendly atmosphere. The aroma of food swirls through the air
and is a treat to your senses. People you don't know say "hello" to you and the Patrons are laughing, smiling
and obviously having a wonderful time and you notice how very clean it is. Your waitress seats you and hands you the menu and immediately brings you your beverage. The menu my friends is wonderful.
If my memory serves me there are at least five rather large pages of food to choose from. For me, this was hard
because everything looked so good. Finally, we made up our minds and ordered a bacon cheeseburger with deep fried mashed potatoes, which by the
way the deep fried mashed potatoes are out of this world, and chicken fried steak with deep fried mashed potatoes.
This came with soup, salad and a dinner roll. The chicken dumpling soup was delicious and full of flavor and the salad
was full of large fresh mushrooms, fresh cucumbers, fresh tomatoes and the salad itself was fresh and crispy. When our main dinner arrived folks I thought my eyes were going to fall out of my head. Normally, when you go to
a restauraunt and order your favorite meal you expect to walk away saying, "I wish they gave bigger portions". NOT THE
CASE at BLUE SKY. Bring your doggy bag. My chicken fried steak took up most of my plate, with a hearty helping
of deep fried mashed potatoes and a hearty helping of stuffing. The stuffing was filled with vegetables and so nicely
flavored. The bacon cheeseburger was smothered with bacon, cheese, tomatoes, and onions. I asked my husband if
he was full when the meal was finished and he said, "I was full 10 minutes ago Chrissy. This bacon cheeseburger was
stuffed with everything". Not to mention folks that the actual hamburger itself was huge. After speaking with Mike, one of the owners, we found out that BLUE SKY cooks their turkey and Amish roast
beef daily. It is always fresh. I took a tour of their dessert display case. The eclairs were as long as
my forearm and easily as wide. The cakes looked like they had just come out of the oven that day. We were
told that people come from miles away just for the desserts and I can honestly see why. Just looking at the food and
desserts is a treat for the eyes. After eating such a large meal it might be hard to eat your dessert, if you are so
full that you can't take one more bite I would suggest taking the dessert to go
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities No Words Our heartfelt sorrow and sympathy go out to Officer Brown, his Family and Friends. How do you tell a family how sorry your are for their loss? Someone lost a son, a child lost a father, a police force lost
a fellow officer and friend and someone lost a partner. There is really no way to put that kind of loss into words and no way to stop the heartbreak. No words.... only time. I did not know him as a person, but as an Officer of the Law he was kind, listened, was not judgmental and he was reassuring.
That kind of Officer could have only been a good person. What we so often forget as citizens is that these men and woman go out on the street everyday, and everyday they put their
lives in danger. We forget to often that if they have to choose between saving our life and their life, they would choose
to save our life. The community of Lorain must do nothing less then honor and pay tribute to this mans life and remember how day-after-day
he, along with his fellow officers, would have gladly given his life to save yours. This community Officer Brown will miss you. Staff of Lorain City Page News.
Fiction can be fun? My Opinion: (I ask you, "what more did he need to know that she was
severly mentally ill? He was wreckless and responsible for the deaths of those children? HE was sane and she was
not, and unless Rusty Yates is a complete idiot, my opinion is that he knew this was going to transpire and he would be free) Even without knowing anything further, this is not the type of person a rational
person would leave five young children with. But the husband's contribution to the tragedy is more causative than just
ignoring warning signs: So I ask, why wasn't Rusty
Yates put on trial for the destruction of Andrea Yates? For the murder of her psyche and for the indirect murder of their
children?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Enter supporting content here |